Showing posts with label James Riddle. Show all posts
Showing posts with label James Riddle. Show all posts

Tuesday, March 20, 2012

Have Humans Run Out of Creativity


The Benefits of Technology are Diminishing is a pretty self-explanatory title. In David Cox’s article, he aims to belittle modern technological advancements based on the fact no recent inventions matches up to past marvels like the wheel or fire. Rather, Cox sees all modern inventions as slight improvements over preexisting ones. The author also relies on statistics to illustrate his point that the peak of mankind’s creativeness has past and that we are currently heading for another “Dark Ages.” He attributes this downfall due to the fact our modern society is very wasteful in terms of resources. Two specific examples of wasted resources the author talks about are fossil fuels and the creativity of youth.
I find the author’s argument and support to be a little ridiculous. Claiming that our modern advancements haven’t been notable improvements upon the preexisting inventions from our grandparents’ era is outlandish. Hybrid vehicle technology is a great example of a necessary modern advancement that will allow the human civilization to better utilize our limited amount of fossil fuels. Despite the fact Cox criticizes our modern society for not conserving our resource we have had inventions that aim to do just that and the author does not acknowledge these as noteworthy. His extreme exaggeration can also be seen in the fact that he refers to the year 2024 as the next “Dark Ages.” In a society with Ipads and the Internet, where we are surrounded by information; how would another Dark Age even be possible, which was the result of a lack of information transfer.
Since our last writing assignment involved thinking about the future I was wondering what you thought the future would be like. Is Cox right, in that human creativity has reached its peak and that from here on out everything is going to be a slight improvement over something we already have? If you think we are following the path described by Cox, what has caused this downfall in human ingenuity? Or do you think Cox is wrong and that the future will hold technical marvels that no one can currently comprehend?